The Waters of the United States, and why political leanings might not mean what you think

I recently listened to an episode of the EconTalk podcast, where host Russ Roberts spoke with Monica Guzman about her book “ I Never Thought of It That Way “, which I’ve shared on here before.

One piece from the podcast really jumped out at me; perhaps it wasn’t in the book, or maybe I just missed it. Either way, Monica shared this related to how Trump voters might think:

So, a bunch of folks from King County had ideas in their heads about people who voted for Trump must hate the environment, must hate gay people, must hate-you know, name your thing. And, among the things we learned was there’s more variables we didn’t consider. Right? That if you’re in that frame of mind, there’s other things you didn’t consider. And, these farmers, many of them brought up this thing we’d never heard of, the Waters of the United States rule. Had you heard of that?

Monica goes on to explain what the “Waters of the United States” is about, and how that can shift voting ideals:

Well, and it’s this part of our law that determines when the federal government can kind of claim regulation authority over a body of water. And, for a lot of farmers, if there’s a really heavy rain in a valley and suddenly there’s a pond where there wasn’t one…